Lots of people ran.
Many of them dressed like idiots.
This guy did not win.
This guy cheated.
Scott MacPherson did win, in 29:58.
Even after taking a spill at the start.
"I am delighted to be returning to London," said Ritzenhein, who was fourth in last year's Great North Run.http://www.virginlondonmarathon.com/news-and-media/news-and-media/press-release-10-01-11-ritz-lead-us-challenge-virg/
Virgin London Marathon race director David Bedford welcomed his new signings, saying:
"I am delighted Dathan will be running the London Marathon again this year."
Best-selling author Robert Whiting, who has seen his share of these disagreements during his long association with Japan, claims culture is usually at the root of the dispute.
"Japanese have looser attitudes toward contracts than Americans," Whiting points out. "They place emphasis on verbal agreement, personal relationships, one's sincerity and the likelihood the situation that exists at the start of the deal will likely change.
"For Americans, a contract is written in stone. For Japanese, it is just a guideline toward a future relationship that is constantly evolving. You are expected to operate in good faith, but what's expected is often vague."
From: Pierre Weiss <pierre@hq.iaaf.org>
Subject: FW: Feedback On About iaaf
To: "brianshrff@yahoo.com" <brianshrff@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Anne-Marie Garrigan" <anne-marie.garrigan@hq.iaaf.org>
Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 11:03 PM
Dear Sir,
It took us some time to reply to your email of March 15th. Indeed- You refer to the fact that this message “is the fourth letter I have written to you since 2007”: we looked in our registration system and we did not find any earlier correspondence
- It looks that they fact that you are critiquing are old by more than 15 years. Why did not react earlier ?
- IAAF is here to help athletes who are in trouble, but these athletes have first to follow the IAAF rules. When you moved from Zimbabwe to Japan in the 90s, you were supposed to have the IAAF authorisation! We conducted research and we did not find any such agreement. Either you got it and this case, send us a copy. Or you did not ask for this authorisation, and your move was illegal ... so don’t ask now for IAAF support !
- You speak also about “an IAAF sanctioned contract with the Mazda Track Club”: this is also new to us. Send us a copy please.
To conclude: it looks that without further information, facts and proofs, there is nothing that we can do for you.Best regardsPierre WeissIAAF General Secretary
A fourth and final installment will follow in a day or two. Thanks for reading.
Sir, you are the first person to enquire without my direct solicitation to you - I am at a loss for words.
My situation is so embarrassing for the Hiroshima establishment (Japanese authorities included) because they have openly confessed to abetting Mazda in defrauding me. However, as they all tell me and any legal adviser that steps up to help me, Mazda is a Japanese company and I'm a foreign so I must 'understand'...
Yes sir, I am still in Hiroshima. It is impossible for me to leave - I came out here with a contract that was impossible to re-write - TAC/IAAF Trust Fund Contract for Corporate Endorsement of Athletes. The contract was the only type available for me to enter Japan.
Payment was one time per year - at the beginning of each contracted year. At a rate of 10 million yen per year I was to receive 70 million yen. I have not seen a penny. Mazda had also used Massachusetts law to end my contract with Reebok - using the right of first refusal clause. By that law Mazda were legally obliged to honor the contract in full. Mazda has simply told me, "Let's talk about it later..."
All expenses were contractually obligated to Mazda. I was charged for all and told I'd be reimbursed. I was to be repatriated to the US at the end of the contract. No sir, that again Mazda has ignored.
Worst of all is that Mazda raided my private trust fund (TAC/IAAF) in Boulder, Colorado to pay tax on the annual payment I had not received. The company produced fake proofs of annual payment showing that I'd been given the money. However they also produced totally different papers a month or so later showing the money would be paid in due course. The Japanese police and immigration have been asking me to simply take it as a lesson learned and return to the US. It's mind boggling how they can fear no retribution nor remorse.
I have all the papers in my possession. The most damning is the document that came out after my Let'srun.com post. Mazda hauled me in with the intent to sue me for libel and slander. My claims had no proof they said. There had never been a contract as I described.
I simply told them to call the government and the JAAF because there was only one type of contract I could enter into with a Japanese company. Mazda then said they changed my contract after I came to Japan. On that I reminded them about the Massachusetts law under which the negotiation with Mazda had taken place. I also mentioned that Mazda had ended my long association with Reebok.
Mazda told me to just find proof my contract claims were real or I'd be in serious trouble.
I was grilled through three meetings in which their demands for proof grew even more threatening in their tone. They didn't mince their words in telling me that I would get physically hurt. But just before the fourth meeting I noticed a Japanese language reference to the actual date of my contract signing. I also noticed that it showed the full term of the deal. I then asked the lead inquisitor to tell the 'court' what he needed from me. He repeated that I just prove Mazda had promised to pay me 10 million per year.
I pointed out to the wording I'd read and asked him to read it and comment. He read it and stunned the room by his totally casual reply, "Yes, we do have your original contract. We are in this meeting only to discuss your Let'srun.com post. You said, "Mazda would pay me 10 million per year - net", we want to tell you we didn't promise such a thing. We said minus taxes. That would be less than 10 million...
I then asked him, "And what about all my expenses including rent. You charged me rent on for seven years and threw me into hotels for three weeks per year at my expense when you closed your dormitory for the holidays. You put your runners in my hotel rooms - thirteen people, and made me pay for the rooms. What does the contract say about that?
He opened his file and took the document out. For fourteen years they'd been telling me it didn't exist. And only a day before they'd threatened me by saying I had one more day to find it or I was dead. They'd even laughed that immigration would never give me a copy claiming that they had bought immigration.
When I demanded to hold the contract in my hand the man hesitated but I raised my voice and he gave it to me. I was stunned. The amount was not 10 million but 11 million yen!
It was bigger than I recalled. And it was signed in a signature I was not using until about 1996 - five years after I had allegedly signed it.
Mazda had been saying they'd changed my contract because I'd arrived late to Japan. That was of course not true but under Japanese law the company has the benefit of the doubt.
However this new document showed under term of agreement that the deal was based on the issuance of a visa to enter Japan. It would be retro-active to the day of signing.
Mazda had had a difficult time obtaining a visa for me for reasons I can explain later - reasons that prove Mazda intended to defraud me from the very beginning. In fact sir, I was trafficked by Mazda from the US under the pretense of having me stay in Japan for six months only. I am still here 18 years later...
Upon the details of that contract being read to the 'court' the senior gentleman who had attended to prosecute me walked out. He had been told to kick me out of Mazda for failing to prove my internet claims. Instead he told me that my internet claims had been kind to Mazda. He was shocked. Less than six months later I was kicked out onto the streets without a single penny. I had been told to wait while Mazda looked into the new phoney contract. Mazda PR and Mazda Legal Department asked me to get a lawyer. I did but the same two groups asked the lawyer to forget about helping me. This has happened three times now.
There is no more course of action other than the type we never want to take. I am surprising myself by the length of time I have managed to physically restrain myself. What's making it worse is that I have also known the exact cause of sudden acceleration in vehicles since 2005. Mazda claimed that I was dangerous and for that and they tried to keep me from leaving the country. I warned through a number of media organisations that there was a serious flaw with the technology they were using. I had discovered the cause when trouble shooting for Mazda and Ford in Venezuela. A memo was then sent by the chief auditor for Mazda warning the company that I was an extremely dangerous man.
I am at a loss...
I am willing to talk with you, tell you all that you may need for your story, and I am no longer afraid of them. They stole my life from me sir. The least I can do is make sure it never happens to any one else again. I will forward a letter I received from the top IAAF man. It will prove to you the corruption in the sport.
Much obliged to you sir,Brian